I don't know what to make of Gorgeous George. On the one hand I cheered him on in his rant in the US Senate when
he gave evidence in relation to the oil-for-food scandal and to allegations that he had diverted profits from his Iraqi charity to himself and business associates. It was good to see someone stand up to the anonymous men in the US Senate who appeared to try to rule the world from cozy Washington.
Also, I read his book which was released when he was expelled from the Labour party and started the Respect party in the UK - the book was full of, what I considered to be good common sense and decency if a little idealistic.
But now, he has gone on Radio 4 in UK (basically the most prestigious news and political radio show in UK) saying that if someone decided to kill Tony Blair it would be "
morally justifiable" - or rather repeating the claim that he made in an interview in GQ magazine.
It's what I like about the guy - he's not afraid to say what he thinks which is refreshing for a politician. And, if you read what he says basically he says that it would be more morally justifiable than the July bombings in London but that he would prefer to see Tony Blair in front of a War Crimes Tribunal for war crimes.
This I would agree with. If it is not the case that a person who takes a country into war on lies and false premises cannot be held accountable for those lies, what is the point of democracy. And, I think that George was merely saying that, since Tony Blair is directly responsible for the murder of innocent Iraqis, there would be more moral justification in killing him than in killing innocent civilians.
But, he must have known how his comments would have been taken and it is a shame to see someone who, for the most part, makes entirely sensible statements which appear to me to be on the side of decency, lose credibility because of the more hyperbolic statements he comes out with. I bet that Labour and Tony love George because he has made himself into the perfect straw man.